"Survival as a species is more important than our individual survival." as human beings, we are naturally inclined to protect our own interests and to pursue our own happiness. But most of us is ready to recognize certain human goals to replace our own interests. For example, the destruction of mankind would be a disaster than a car accident in which a person died; if I were to become the single fatality, would still be inclined to agree, while the effect on me would be the same in both cases.
"We are one with the future generations, and we will actively share in their lives." us affect them the decisions we make today. Long before I personally spend scene, yet we are present in memories, customs and cultures of our descendants. Our present actions will continue to affect their range of choices and opportunities.In summary, the raw material, which is what we do now is formed the futuro.Por we therefore, while we will not always participate personally in the events of this world, are always actively part of what you can and happen here.
Another question about the quality of the environment for future generations is directly related to our concerns of the contamination. these extend from impurities in the water and air to the protection of the ozone layer and safe disposal of nuclear waste.If we have any responsibility to future generations, we must at least be obliged to let them air to breathe, water to drink and the soil on the farm.
But we have to decide what proportion of our wealth should be diverted to the task of safeguarding these elements. we have the spending of clean up the mess that bequeathed us past generations, or we can simply make our best not to increase the load on the future? do at a glance, if the task of preserving the quality of the environment requires the sacrifice of our current lifestyle, we are ourselves morally obliged to make the adjustment?
No comments:
Post a Comment