What is our obligation to future generations about the size of its population?

What is our obligation to future generations in relation to the size of its population? On the basis of the importance of the survival of the species, we have a responsibility to provide for some future... any size, brings greater happiness... seems to be the most moral choice.

In addition, because as a member of a generation ?-before any accidental, whatever responsibilities owe those present that are parallel to the responsibilities we owe to future people.

In accordance with the principle of essential similarity between all members of the human species, these responsibilities will include at least the fulfilment of the fundamental human rights, the most important of which is the right to existir.En other words, we owe it to future people the opportunity to meet their basic needs for a decent life. This obligation more fully listed in the following paragraphs as we examine the other three questions.

It is not so difficult moral issues relating to the types and quantities of non-renewable resources and quality and the diversity of the gene pool of transmitted to future generations.Because it is no accident that generation we are born, we are responsible for providing for the future to the extent that we provide to our own.

Already we have assumed that future generations will be essentially the same as we are and seek their own happiness, morally cannot deny the opportunity for the progreso.Por therefore, we are forced to leave them in the types and quantities of non-renewable reserve that we can reasonably anticipate that they are needed.For example, we can already foresee alternatives to oil reserves for these purposes in the foreseeable future.

One of the prerequisites of progress for any generation is diversidad.Nuevas possibilities arise as a result of the confluence of ideas, materials and people.

It is also true with regard to the resources of this necesidad.Sin various resources to implement new ideas, ideas are useless. therefore, our responsibility to generations future compels us to preserve diversity.

We Have any liability to limit the size of future generations?

In recent years has decreased the rate of increase in the population, so that today many countries already nearing zero population growth. Forecasting future population has been revised down due to fewer people born now means less reproduction of a generation from now.

Because each generation has the exclusive power to bequeath life text, each generation determines that shall be members of the following. The choices we make our first moral responsibility. Do wrongly acting reasonably lead a happy life and to contribute to the happiness of others?This would imply that a potentially unhappy person has no right to exist are rights, then, simply a function of happiness?

We have no responsibility to limit the size of future generations? if so, what criteria so we? Obviously, population policies raises a number of complex moral issues.

Resources are another area of concern that many non-renewable resources which we consider vital to the maintenance of Western civilisation, such as petroleum, silver, zinc and Tin ética.Sabemos, are in short supply and it will soon be depleted at current rates of use. A responsible policy towards future generations could therefore require sacrifices in our skills to find substitute materials among the most abundant land products? For example, copper, once you think that ideal for electrical communications driver is now being replaced by optical fibers made from Silicon common substance.

Closely related to this issue is the preserve adequate genetic heritage.The inherited characteristics of each bacterium for baby alive, agency, is transmitted through one set of genes.Diversity of plants and animals is preserved by gene recombination process reproductivo.Así, genes in the "pool" of being elected, the possible range.

When certain varieties of plants or animals become sets all extinct genes are lost to siempre.muchas plants and animals are driven to extinction every year. and because we want to wake up high quality strains only plant and animal breeding, some varieties are allowed to disappear.

The Rise of Muhammad and Islam

Mohammad (who became a Prophet) was born in Arabia in the city of Mecca in 570. Came from a prominent and had been highly respected wealthy family. Mohammed said people who chose to listen that he had visions. In these visions was declared to him who is the last and only Prophet to reveal the truth. Mohammed did not deny other prophets such as Moses and Jesus Christ, but the key thing about it was that he is the last and only Prophet which can reveal the truth.

The religion preached by Mohammed was simple and accessible: a strict belief in one God with no complications requiring Christianity - no live after the flesh, but after the spirit. Islam teaches a simple one that is similar to the practiced by Jews that was related to hygiene and cleaning ritual.The emphasis of basic such as courage, charity and the hospitalidad.Y virtues especially promises believers potentials that those who fell in love with his religion went straight to the paradise that the scripture of Islam, the Quran is described in detail and seems fun compared to the paradise of Christians Iran to.

For example, in Islam when dies a man will have virgins in paradise, which he can do what pleases with ellos.Todo time here on Earth a Muslim man may marry women. If you want to deal with Islam to Christianity is that Islam is the religion of the meat - carnal passions.

Combined with military force, the message of Islam was very powerful. In the ten years before his death in 632, that Muhammad had joined all belligerents divided the tribes and the cities of Arabia.644, I.e., 12 years after his death, Egypt and Libya had fallen to Islam, as well as Syria, Iraq and Persia.Por time the century ended in 700 AD Arab armies had been ousted from what remained in the Persian Empire, then, besieged Constantinople - capital of the Byzantine Empire was the Emperor Constantine released. And other 15 years Islam has spread from India to Spain. Part of the secret of its success was that they were not backward and uncivilized as appeared in appearance.

Arabia for a long time has been a long path for trade in spices, perfumes and esclavos.Mohammed himself was a merchant in Mecca, before he thought of himself as a Mecca profeta.La was the big commercial city and Mohammed found its first support of its assertions as Prophet in Medina, another merchant city.Mohammed also knew much about Christianity and Judaism.Once was represented by its diehards in a plane sitting on a donkey with Jesus Christ.

Another part of the success of Arabic was that they were Semites speaks a Semitic language that was near Aramaic, a language spoken by common people of Iraq to Palestine.

Perhaps the most crucial fact that made them successful was your tolerance religiosa.Los Muslims in his wars of conquest not attempted to exterminate those who believed in Judaism, Christianity, or any other cosa.Afirmaron, simply, a higher revelation that made them appear as a chosen people entitled to special land and exclusive access privileges to the cielo.Esto left the Muslims not second class citizens - tolerated, but a little despreciaba.Y even more Muslims did not pay taxes only unpaid taxes Muslim and this was a strong argument for conversion and a strong argument for Muslims to tolerate to non-Muslims.

Some budgets of humanity

"As members of the human species, future generations is essentially the same as us." I.e. the same basic needs have and seek the same basic rights. For basic necessities I mean, at least, those things necessary for human survival: food, water, air, etc. Also included, negatively the protection conditions of destruction of life, such as extreme temperatures, poisoned or harmful levels of radioactivity environment. These needs derived directly from the most basic human right, the right to exist. There are other rights and other needs, too, but the claim to them is less powerful than claims related to life itself.

"Future generations treated his own pleasure, just as we do." Utilitarian calling this force only motivating of human activity on the basis that all the other reasons can be reduced to him. It therefore has proposed the general ethical principle that we should always try to maximize human happiness and minimize human pain. Given that people born in future generations will be being part of our species, we can boast of this principle to describe his ethics as well.So the principle applies intergenerationally.estamos morally obliged to find the maximum of all people, present and future happiness.

"One is born a generation by an accident of history." None of us chose when he or she was born.As we could have been born in any generation, there is no claim to special for our own interests.Indeed, if an impartial observer who could see all generations at once they were asked to solve these problems, he would certainly try to be fair to all generations - past, present and future. If this statement is valid for the impartial observer, shouldn't it also be valid for each generation, including our members? "Golden rule" applies not only to his contemporaries; applies as well as intergenerationally.

This article has been viewed 5 hours.
Paper presented at: September 19, 2010

The mysterious end of maya civilization

Currently in progress, seems to not have any land on which the research is not done. Scientists are in their struggle to find answers to some questions nervous, responses that can change the world in which we live. Today most burning question revolves around the infertility. Not surprisingly, it has been solved in the form of in vitro fertilization, but when you reply to a question, many others arise. One of such pressing issues as part of the action carried out research is to find out exactly how ended the Mayan civilization.

By the way, was an ancient civilization that excelled in architecture and other sophisticated concepts of astronomy and mathematics, much of what we do. Ironically, civilization collapsed at the height of its glory around the year 800. Its remains can be seen in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico to Honduras.It seems as if the entire civilization disappeared in an instant, leaving the cities, trade routes and pyramids desertadas. urgent issue that bothers to scientists is what led to the collapse of the great Mayan civilization?

But frankly, there is no answer directly forward, but do theories exist.Some attribute the drastic climate change to be the sole author, while others believe that human intervention to be a contributor igual.No matter what was the reason, remains one of the greatest archaeological mysteries of our time. Some people often ask why scientists are so curious to dig the answers on the maya civilization, when there are so many other ancient extinct civilizations in the world.

It is because people of that time were qualified astronomers that constantly followed by the movements of the Sun and the moon. Had predicted eclipses, explained the movement of the planets, and even came to ask three sophisticated calendar separate immaculate studies. Had an extremely complicated method to keep track of time.

The most fascinating part of these calendars was the phenomenon of the long count. Long number is basically the period from the beginning until the end of time.They assign point zero until the moment when the time will be for the universe.And here is the kicker; his long account expires 12-21-2012 which is just around the corner.

So now you know why scientists are struggling to find any remaining literature of maya civilization.They believe that there are a lot of credibility in his trabajo.Esos guys knew much about stars hell and were able to calculate the exact duration of one year at a thousandth part of a decimal point, much more accurate that nobody has done jamás.Además, his predictions on solar or lunar eclipse were bang on destino.Así that when they say that something is changing in 2012, one can dare not take it lightly.

Even though the scientists found that they were well or is not, even the mystery of his disappearance extended or sudden droughts turnover repentina.Las climate is not an answer good enough especially without scientific evidence.

Some ethical problems on humanity

"Survival as a species is more important than our individual survival." as human beings, we are naturally inclined to protect our own interests and to pursue our own happiness. But most of us is ready to recognize certain human goals to replace our own interests. For example, the destruction of mankind would be a disaster than a car accident in which a person died; if I were to become the single fatality, would still be inclined to agree, while the effect on me would be the same in both cases.

"We are one with the future generations, and we will actively share in their lives." us affect them the decisions we make today. Long before I personally spend scene, yet we are present in memories, customs and cultures of our descendants. Our present actions will continue to affect their range of choices and opportunities.In summary, the raw material, which is what we do now is formed the futuro.Por we therefore, while we will not always participate personally in the events of this world, are always actively part of what you can and happen here.

Another question about the quality of the environment for future generations is directly related to our concerns of the contamination. these extend from impurities in the water and air to the protection of the ozone layer and safe disposal of nuclear waste.If we have any responsibility to future generations, we must at least be obliged to let them air to breathe, water to drink and the soil on the farm.

But we have to decide what proportion of our wealth should be diverted to the task of safeguarding these elements. we have the spending of clean up the mess that bequeathed us past generations, or we can simply make our best not to increase the load on the future? do at a glance, if the task of preserving the quality of the environment requires the sacrifice of our current lifestyle, we are ourselves morally obliged to make the adjustment?